Technology

Centralized Server Monitoring and Alerting with Prometheus, Grafana and Zabbix

When you manage more than a handful of servers, “logging in and checking top” stops being a monitoring strategy. You need a single, reliable place where CPU, RAM, disk, network, database, HTTP checks and hardware metrics come together; where alerts are consistent; and where teams see the same truth. In real hosting environments, that usually means combining pull-based metrics (Prometheus), rich dashboards (Grafana) and agent/SNMP‑driven monitoring (Zabbix) into one centralized architecture. In this article, we will walk through how we at dchost.com design such a stack for VPS, dedicated server and colocation infrastructures.

We will focus on practical architecture: how Prometheus scrapes exporters, how Zabbix agents and proxies fit in, how Grafana sits on top as a shared observability layer, and how to avoid common traps like noisy alerts or under‑sizing your monitoring server. Whether you run a few production VPS servers or a mixed fleet of physical nodes, switches and firewalls in a rack, this guide will help you build a centralized monitoring and alerting platform that scales cleanly.

İçindekiler

Why Centralized Server Monitoring Matters

One place for all signals

In most environments we see, monitoring starts with a mix of ad‑hoc tools: a simple uptime checker here, a panel resource graph there, maybe a local script sending emails on high load. It works until it doesn’t. The moment you have multiple VPS, dedicated servers or on‑prem machines, fragmented tools become a problem:

  • You cannot see correlations (e.g. load on one database node vs. queue length on an app node).
  • You lose time switching between dashboards when diagnosing issues.
  • Each team creates their own monitoring “island” with different thresholds and alert styles.

A centralized architecture fixes this by pulling metrics from every server and device into a single platform, applying consistent alert rules and offering shared dashboards for operations, developers and management.

Faster incident response and fewer blind spots

With centralized monitoring, you can answer questions quickly:

  • “Is slow checkout caused by the web layer, the database, the cache server, or the payment API latency?”
  • “Is this spike in 5xx errors a one‑off or part of a trend over the last 30 days?”
  • “Which servers are close to running out of disk or inodes in the next week?”

By combining time‑series metrics (Prometheus), agent/SNMP checks (Zabbix) and visual analysis (Grafana), you no longer guess; you see. For example, you can correlate MySQL query latency, PHP‑FPM pool saturation and HTTP response codes on the same Grafana panel.

Capacity planning and cost control

Monitoring is not only about catching errors. When you observe resource usage over weeks and months, you can right‑size VPS and dedicated servers instead of over‑provisioning everything “just in case”. We routinely use centralized metrics to decide:

  • When to move a busy WooCommerce store from shared hosting to a VPS or from a single VPS to a small cluster.
  • Whether extra RAM or faster NVMe storage will yield more benefit for a specific workload.
  • Which nodes are consistently under‑used and can be consolidated to save budget.

If you want a deeper dive into capacity planning, we cover sizing decisions in our guide on WooCommerce capacity planning for vCPU, RAM and IOPS, and similar principles apply to generic application servers.

The Roles of Prometheus, Grafana and Zabbix

Prometheus: time‑series metrics and alerting

Prometheus is optimized for collecting and querying numerical time‑series data (metrics). It is pull‑based: Prometheus servers regularly “scrape” HTTP endpoints (exporters) that expose metrics in a specific text format. Key benefits:

  • High‑resolution metrics (e.g. every 15–30 seconds) with efficient on‑disk storage.
  • Powerful query language (PromQL) for aggregations, rates, histograms and more.
  • Easy integration with modern software via exporters (Node Exporter, Blackbox, MySQL, Nginx, etc.).
  • Built‑in integration with Alertmanager for rule‑based alerts.

For VPS environments, we often deploy Node Exporter on each Linux server to collect CPU, memory, disk, filesystem, network and basic system metrics, then scrape them from a central Prometheus instance. We’ve published a detailed step‑by‑step playbook for this in our article on building a calm VPS monitoring stack with Prometheus, Grafana and Node Exporter.

Grafana: dashboards and cross‑source visualization

Grafana is the visualization and dashboard layer of the stack. It doesn’t store data itself; instead, it connects to multiple data sources:

  • Prometheus for time‑series metrics.
  • Zabbix via the official Grafana Zabbix data source plugin.
  • Other systems like Loki (logs), MySQL, Elasticsearch and more.

With Grafana you can build shared dashboards that mix, for example, Prometheus metrics for application performance, Zabbix metrics for hardware health and network devices, and logs visualized via Loki. This “single glass” makes on‑call work and capacity reviews far easier.

Zabbix: agent/SNMP monitoring and auto‑discovery

Zabbix covers use cases that Prometheus alone doesn’t handle as elegantly, particularly in mixed environments with a lot of legacy or network equipment:

  • Agent‑based monitoring for Windows and Linux servers, including OS‑level checks, services and log patterns.
  • SNMP monitoring for switches, routers, firewalls and UPS/PDU devices.
  • Auto‑discovery and low‑level discovery (LLD) to find interfaces, disks, sensors and create items/triggers automatically.
  • Enterprise‑grade features like proxies for distributed setups, escalation steps, maintenance windows and built‑in alerting.

In many dchost.com projects, Zabbix is our “inventory‑aware” system: it knows all hosts, groups, templates and dependencies, while Prometheus focuses on high‑resolution metrics from exporters.

Why combine them instead of choosing one?

Prometheus and Zabbix overlap in some areas but shine in different ones. A combined architecture lets you:

  • Use Prometheus where exporters and time‑series analytics matter (applications, databases, HTTP checks).
  • Use Zabbix for inventory, SNMP network gear, Windows agents, and classic IT monitoring workflows.
  • Use Grafana on top of both as the central visualization and (optionally) alerting console.

From an operational standpoint, teams see one familiar interface (Grafana) while you retain the strengths of each backend.

Reference Architecture for Centralized Monitoring

High‑level overview

A typical centralized monitoring and alerting architecture we deploy for customers looks like this:

  • Monitoring core (usually on a dedicated VPS or server):
    • Prometheus server (+ optional Alertmanager).
    • Zabbix server (with its database, usually MariaDB/PostgreSQL).
    • Grafana instance, connected to both as data sources.
  • Monitored infrastructure:
    • Linux and Windows servers (VPS, bare metal, on‑prem) with exporters and/or Zabbix agents.
    • Network devices (switches, routers, firewalls, load balancers) via SNMP and ICMP.
    • Applications and databases via specialized exporters and Zabbix templates.
  • Notification channels:
    • Alertmanager routing to email, chat, webhooks.
    • Zabbix media types for email, chat, SMS or ticketing.

All monitored nodes send or expose metrics to the core; no local dashboards are needed on each server. We usually place the monitoring core in a separate project or VLAN so that a problem on production servers does not immediately take down the monitoring system.

Network layout and connectivity

For security and reliability, we recommend:

  • One dedicated monitoring VPS or dedicated server per environment (e.g. production vs staging), or a single powerful node with strict RBAC for multi‑tenant setups.
  • Restricting access to Prometheus scrape ports and Zabbix agents via firewalls or VPN, not open to the whole internet.
  • Using private IPs between monitoring core and monitored nodes whenever possible.
  • Terminating all web UI access (Grafana, Zabbix front‑end) over HTTPS with strong TLS settings; our guide on modern TLS protocol updates covers the recommended ciphers and versions.

On dchost.com infrastructure, we often place the monitoring VPS in the same region as the servers it monitors to minimize latency, but isolated enough that a misconfiguration or resource spike in production does not instantly affect monitoring.

Component sizing

Sizing depends heavily on scrape intervals and number of time‑series, but for reference:

  • For 10–50 servers with basic Node Exporter + a few application exporters, a 2–4 vCPU VPS with 8–16 GB RAM and fast SSD/NVMe storage is usually enough for Prometheus, Grafana and a small Zabbix instance.
  • For 50–200 servers plus network gear, separate your stack:
    • One node for Prometheus (+ Alertmanager + Grafana).
    • One node for Zabbix server and its database.
  • For 200+ servers, consider Prometheus federation, multiple Zabbix proxies and possibly dedicated database servers for Zabbix.

Centralized monitoring traffic is usually modest compared to application traffic, but make sure the monitoring node has enough disk IOPS to handle Prometheus and Zabbix writes. Our NVMe vs SSD vs HDD guide for hosting explains how storage choices impact metrics and log workloads.

Onboarding Servers and Services

Installing exporters for Prometheus

For Linux VPS and dedicated servers, a typical Prometheus exporter set includes:

  • Node Exporter: OS metrics (CPU, RAM, disk, filesystem, network, load averages).
  • Process/service exporters: e.g. MySQL exporter, PostgreSQL exporter, Redis exporter, Nginx/Apache exporters.
  • Blackbox Exporter: HTTP, TCP, ICMP, DNS checks from the monitoring node’s perspective.

Each exporter listens on a local TCP port (often 9100 for Node Exporter, 9115 for Blackbox, etc.) and Prometheus is configured with a scrape_config listing the targets and labels. We recommend building service discovery based on host groups or naming conventions so you don’t edit config files every time you add a server.

Deploying Zabbix agents and proxies

Zabbix offers two main connection patterns:

  • Agent active/passive checks: the agent runs on the host and either connects to the server (active) or listens for requests (passive).
  • Zabbix proxies: intermediate nodes that collect data from agents and SNMP devices, then relay it to the main Zabbix server.

For distributed environments with multiple locations or restricted networks, proxies simplify firewall rules and reduce load on the central server. Typical use cases:

  • A Zabbix proxy in each data center / rack collecting SNMP from switches and agents from local servers.
  • One proxy per customer network in agency scenarios, reporting back to a central Zabbix server at dchost.com.

Templates in Zabbix (for Linux, Windows, MySQL, Nginx, etc.) make onboarding faster; they create items, triggers and graphs automatically when you add a host.

Monitoring network devices and hardware

Prometheus is excellent for applications, but classic network and hardware monitoring is still more convenient with Zabbix:

  • Use SNMP templates for switches, routers, firewalls, load balancers, UPS and PDU units.
  • Monitor interfaces, errors, dropped packets, bandwidth usage and hardware sensors (temperature, fans, power).
  • Use ICMP ping checks (with dependencies) so that one failed upstream router doesn’t generate hundreds of downstream host alerts.

For physical servers in colocation racks, we often use Zabbix IPMI or vendor‑specific agents (where available) to track hardware alerts that don’t surface at the OS level.

Combining uptime checks with deeper metrics

Uptime checks (is port 443 answering?) are useful but not enough. A page may be “up” while database queries are timing out. We usually combine:

  • HTTP/HTTPS probes via Blackbox Exporter (Prometheus) and/or simple Zabbix web scenarios.
  • Application metrics like request rate, error rate, latency histograms.
  • Resource metrics like CPU saturation, cache hit ratios, DB connections.

If you need a lightweight external uptime monitor for public status pages, we covered that separately in our guide on setting up your own status page with Uptime Kuma. In this article, we focus on the deeper internal metrics layer.

Designing Useful Dashboards and Alerts

Grafana as the shared observability layer

Once Prometheus and Zabbix are collecting data, Grafana becomes your shared window into the system. We recommend:

  • Creating role‑based dashboards:
    • “Ops overview”: infrastructure health across all regions and services.
    • “Application team” dashboards: metrics tied to a specific product or microservice.
    • “Management” views: high‑level uptime, SLA compliance and capacity trends.
  • Using variables (drop‑downs) for selecting environments, clusters, hosts and time ranges.
  • Mixing Prometheus and Zabbix panels in the same dashboard where appropriate (e.g. application metrics from Prometheus, interface health from Zabbix).

Grafana also supports annotations; you can mark deployments, configuration changes or incidents on the timeline to correlate with metric changes.

Where to put alert logic: Prometheus, Zabbix or Grafana?

There are three main options for alerting in this architecture:

  1. Prometheus + Alertmanager for time‑series alerting:
    • Use PromQL alert rules (e.g. high CPU over 5 minutes, error rate spikes, SLO violations).
    • Route alerts by labels (service, severity, team) to email, chat or webhooks.
  2. Zabbix triggers for SNMP/agent‑based alerts:
    • Use templates to define host‑class‑specific thresholds.
    • Use escalations and dependencies for more advanced flows.
  3. Grafana alerts (optional):
    • Useful when you want alert rules that span multiple data sources.
    • Can be configured directly from existing dashboard panels.

Our usual pattern:

  • Keep infrastructure and application SLO alerts in Prometheus/Alertmanager.
  • Keep device and inventory‑centric alerts (SNMP, agent checks, disks, power, temperature) in Zabbix.
  • Use Grafana alerts sparingly, usually for cross‑source checks or business‑level indicators.

Avoiding alert fatigue

A noisy alert system is as bad as no monitoring at all. Concrete tips:

  • Start with a small, high‑value set of alerts: host down, disk almost full, HTTP 5xx spike, DB latency, Redis saturation.
  • Use for durations (e.g. CPU > 90% for 5 minutes) instead of alerting on every spike.
  • Implement silences and maintenance windows during planned work.
  • Group alerts by service or cluster to avoid a flood when an upstream dependency fails.

When you integrate log‑based alerts later (e.g. with Loki), make sure they complement, not duplicate, metric alerts. Our article on centralized VPS log management with Grafana Loki and Promtail shows how we approach log alerts without overwhelming teams.

Integrating Logs, Metrics and Uptime

Why logs still matter

Metrics tell you that something is wrong; logs often tell you why. A mature observability stack typically includes:

  • Metrics: Prometheus (system and application metrics).
  • Events/alerts: Prometheus Alertmanager + Zabbix triggers.
  • Logs: Loki, ELK or similar, often visualized in Grafana.
  • Uptime checks: external and internal HTTP/TCP checks.

We frequently pair the Prometheus + Zabbix + Grafana stack with either Loki or ELK for logs. For hosting environments with many VPS and sites, we summarized patterns in our guide on centralizing logs from multiple servers using ELK and Loki.

End‑to‑end flow during an incident

In a well‑designed centralized architecture, a typical production issue looks like this from the operator’s perspective:

  1. Alertmanager sends a high error‑rate alert for the checkout service, pointing to a Grafana dashboard.
  2. In Grafana, you see
    • HTTP 5xx rate increased, response time jumped.
    • DB latency increased at the same time.
    • CPU and RAM are normal, but disk I/O is high.
  3. You jump to the logs panel (same Grafana, Loki data source) filtered for that service and time range.
  4. Log traces show lock wait timeouts on a specific table; a recent deployment added a heavy query.
  5. You roll back the change, confirm that error rates and DB latency return to normal.

Because all signals are centralized and linked, the incident is more about reading a story than hunting across five tools.

Practical Implementation Steps on VPS or Dedicated Servers

1. Choose and prepare the monitoring host

Start with a dedicated monitoring VPS or server at dchost.com, sized according to your fleet (see sizing notes above). On this host:

  • Harden the OS (updates, firewall, non‑root SSH). Our general VPS security hardening checklist is a good baseline.
  • Ensure correct timezone and NTP sync so metrics and logs align; our guide on server timezone and NTP configuration explains why this matters for reliable monitoring.
  • Plan disks with enough space for Prometheus TSDB and Zabbix database retention.

2. Install Prometheus, Alertmanager and Grafana

On the monitoring host:

  • Install Prometheus and configure basic scrape jobs (self‑monitoring plus a couple of test hosts).
  • Install Alertmanager and set up a minimal alert route to email or chat.
  • Install Grafana, secure it with strong admin credentials and TLS, and add Prometheus as a data source.
  • Import or create initial dashboards (e.g. “Node overview”, “MySQL overview”).

If you prefer a more guided first setup, our article on getting started with Prometheus and Grafana for VPS monitoring walks through a minimal but production‑friendly configuration.

3. Install Zabbix server and connect it to Grafana

Next, install Zabbix server (and a database) on the same host or a separate one, depending on your scale. Then:

  • Set up the Zabbix front‑end over HTTPS.
  • Create host groups reflecting your environment (e.g. “web‑prod”, “db‑prod”, “network‑core”).
  • Deploy Zabbix agents to a few test servers and link them to appropriate templates.
  • In Grafana, install and configure the Zabbix data source plugin so Zabbix metrics are available alongside Prometheus.

4. Roll out exporters and agents across your fleet

Once core components work, onboard the rest of your infrastructure:

  • Automate Node Exporter and other exporters deployment via Ansible, scripts or images.
  • Define Prometheus scrape_config blocks per role (web, db, cache, worker) using labels, not hard‑coded hostnames where possible.
  • Roll out Zabbix agents and/or SNMP templates to servers and network devices.
  • Gradually enable templates and alerts, starting with non‑critical warnings to avoid noise.

5. Build and iterate dashboards and alert rules

With data flowing, sit down with operations and development teams to design dashboards and alerts that match how you actually work:

  • Start from real incidents you’ve had in the past and design signals that would have revealed them early.
  • Define SLOs/SLAs where relevant (e.g. 99.9% uptime, 95th percentile latency) and create corresponding Prometheus alerts.
  • Review alert noise after a few weeks; tune thresholds, groupings and durations.

Monitoring is not “set and forget”; it’s an evolving part of your hosting architecture, just like backups and security.

Security, Multi‑Tenancy and Access Control

Securing data paths

Monitoring systems have a lot of sensitive information: IPs, hostnames, internal URLs, sometimes even business metrics. Protect them by:

  • Restricting exporter and agent ports via host‑level firewalls or network ACLs.
  • Using mutual TLS (mTLS) or VPN for connections across untrusted networks.
  • Enabling role‑based access in Grafana and Zabbix, so each team only sees what they should.
  • Backing up configuration and dashboards securely, along with the rest of your hosting backups.

Agency and multi‑tenant scenarios

If you are an agency or a team managing multiple client environments on dchost.com, a centralized monitoring stack is especially valuable:

  • Group clients by folders/teams in Grafana and host groups in Zabbix.
  • Use labels in Prometheus (e.g. tenant="client-a") to filter dashboards and alerts.
  • Expose read‑only Grafana dashboards per client if needed, while keeping write access internal.

This model lines up well with the way we design monitoring for client websites at scale for agencies, where SSL expiry, domain renewal and uptime checks are also centralized.

How We Apply This Stack at dchost.com

Typical real‑world scenario

Let’s take a common example we see with customers:

  • 5–10 production VPS for web, app and database roles.
  • 1–2 dedicated servers as storage or high‑traffic database nodes.
  • A rack or colocation setup with switches, firewalls and a few physical servers.

We usually deploy:

  • One central monitoring VPS in the same region with Prometheus, Alertmanager, Grafana and (for this size) Zabbix server.
  • Node Exporter + service exporters on all Linux servers; Zabbix agents on both Linux and Windows where needed.
  • SNMP monitoring for the network devices in colocation.
  • Grafana dashboards organized by environment (prod/stage) and system type (web, db, network).
  • Alert rules focused on host down, disk thresholds, HTTP 5xx spikes, DB saturation and SSL expiry.

From there, we iterate: add more application‑specific metrics, refine SLOs, integrate log data, and adjust retention as data and teams grow.

Why host monitoring on separate infrastructure?

We highly recommend running your centralized monitoring on its own VPS or server instead of mixing it into an application node. Advantages:

  • Monitoring stays up while production servers are being rebooted, migrated or scaled.
  • Resource spikes on your apps don’t starve Prometheus or Zabbix.
  • Security boundaries are clearer: you can lock down monitoring access separately.

At dchost.com we size and place monitoring VPSs specifically for this role, whether your main workloads are on our shared hosting, VPS, dedicated or colocation platforms.

Conclusion: Building a Monitoring Foundation You Can Trust

A robust centralized server monitoring and alerting architecture is not a luxury; it is part of the foundation of reliable hosting. By combining Prometheus for time‑series metrics, Zabbix for agent/SNMP and inventory‑centric monitoring, and Grafana as a unified visualization and optional alerting layer, you get the best of each tool without locking yourself into a single mindset or workflow.

Start small: a dedicated monitoring VPS, Node Exporter on a few servers, a Zabbix server with basic templates, and a handful of meaningful alerts. Then grow deliberately: add exporters, proxies, log integration and more sophisticated SLO‑based rules as your environment expands. If you’d like help designing or hosting such a stack—whether you run a handful of VPS, several dedicated servers or a full colocation footprint—our team at dchost.com can size the right monitoring host, configure Prometheus, Grafana and Zabbix, and integrate them with your existing infrastructure so you have a monitoring platform you can rely on for years.

Frequently Asked Questions

Prometheus and Zabbix solve overlapping but different problems. Prometheus is excellent for high‑resolution time‑series metrics, modern exporters and powerful PromQL‑based alerting, especially for applications and databases. Zabbix, on the other hand, shines for agent‑based monitoring, SNMP network devices, auto‑discovery and inventory‑centric workflows. In a centralized architecture, we often use Prometheus for application and resource metrics, Zabbix for hardware and network gear, and Grafana on top of both for unified dashboards. This lets you keep the strengths of each tool without forcing everything into a single monitoring model.

For anything beyond a tiny lab, we strongly recommend a separate VPS or dedicated server for monitoring. If you run Prometheus, Zabbix and Grafana on an application node, resource spikes or reboots on that node can take down monitoring exactly when you need it most. A dedicated monitoring host isolates resource usage, simplifies firewall rules and gives you a stable base for metrics and alerts. At dchost.com we usually size a monitoring VPS specifically for this role and place it in the same region or data center as the systems it monitors for low latency and predictable performance.

Requirements depend on how many servers and metrics you collect, and on your retention period. As a rough starting point, 2–4 vCPUs, 8–16 GB RAM and fast SSD/NVMe storage are usually enough for 10–50 servers with Node Exporter, a few application exporters and a small Zabbix instance. For 50–200 servers you may want to separate Prometheus+Grafana and Zabbix onto different nodes and allocate more RAM and disk. The most important factor is disk IOPS, because Prometheus TSDB and the Zabbix database perform frequent writes; NVMe disks provide much smoother performance than spinning disks for these workloads.

Grafana can send alerts directly and that is useful when you want rules that span multiple data sources. However, we usually keep most alert logic as close to the data as possible: Prometheus rules for time‑series metrics and Zabbix triggers for agent/SNMP checks. This keeps alert definitions versionable and easier to reason about for each system. Grafana alerts are then reserved for a smaller set of cross‑source or business‑level checks. Whichever path you choose, make sure you centralize notification channels and implement silences or maintenance windows to avoid alert fatigue.

Prometheus and Zabbix focus on metrics and checks, while logs provide detailed context when something goes wrong. In mature setups we often add a log stack such as Loki or ELK and expose it as another Grafana data source. During an incident, you jump from a metrics panel showing high error rate or latency into a logs panel filtered by service and time window. This approach keeps metrics, events and logs in one place without overloading a single tool. Our dedicated guide on centralized VPS log management with Grafana Loki explains how to design retention, indexing and alerts around logs so they complement, not duplicate, your metric‑based alerts.